ABSTRACT
Objective To find out the causes of food poisoning in a school banquet and identify the pathogenic bacteria, so as to provide evidence for the treatment of food poisoning. Methods A field epidemiological survey was conducted to search for cases, find suspicious poisoning meals and food, and collect cases and food samples for laboratory testing, to determine pathogenic pathogens and virulence genes. The pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was applied to identify the homology of the pathogens. Results A total of 92 poisoning cases were found, and the incidence rate was 46.94%. The main clinical manifestations were diarrhea (93.48%), abdominal pain (86.96%), nausea (39.13%), vomiting (34.78%) and fever (17.39%). The median of onset latency was 17 hours. Vibrio parahaemolyticus was detected in samples from 3 patients (2 stools and 1 anal swab). The virulence gene trh was positive and the similarity coefficient of PFGE banding was 97.4%. Pathogenic bacteria were not detected in 10 food samples. The results of the case-control study showed that six types of food were suspicious (OR values were 15.75, 10.14, 8.44, 5.93, 5.56 and 4.71 respectively, P1), including couple lung slices and California bass with extremely high risk of exposure (OR values>10). Conclusion The food poisoning resulted from this enrollment banquet was caused by trh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus and no suspicious food was identified (the possibility of contamination by couples' lung slices and California sea bass was high). It is suggested that the supervision and management of catering units and food safety publicity and education should be strengthened to reduce the occurrence of food-borne diseases from the source.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the therapeutic effect of diltiazem and felodipine in treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation.Methods Sixty patients with hypertension after renal transplantation who were treated with tacrolimus as basic immunosuppressive therapy were divided into two groups by random digits table method with 30 cases each.The diltiazem group took diltiazem 90 mg orally once a day.The felodipine group received felodipine 2.5 mg orally twice a day.The drug dosages were adjusted according to the level of blood pressure.The patients were followed up for 1 year.The artery pressure,concentration-to-dose ratio of tacrolimus and renal function was detected and compared.Results Blood pressure was significantly decreased in both groups after 1 year treatment.Blood pressure was found to be significantly lowered from (153.6± 7.5)/ (97.7 ±6.7) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) to (119.1 ± 26.4)/ (72.6± 19.3) mm Hgin felodipine group; and from (152.0 ± 7.6)/(95.4 ± 6.9) mm Hg to (120.3 ± 25.5)/(73.2 ± 22.5) mm Hg in diltiazem group.There was no significant difference in blood pressure before and after treatment between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The concentration-to-dose ratio of tacrolimus was increased after treatment in diltiazem group[(173.2 ± 59.3) g/L vs.(119.3 ± 78.3) g/L] (P ＜ 0.05),but there was no significant difference before and after treatment in felodipine group (P ＞ 0.05).The serum creatinine had no significant difference in two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Diltiazem and felodipine can be used safely and effectively in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation,and diltiazem can lower the dose of tacrolimus.